[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:47:12 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Charles Duffy <address@hidden>
> I read this as being a touch misleading wrt who-said-what --
> particularly, representing my position as Florian's and vice-versa.
I'm sorry. When replying, I thought to myself "I'll bet I'm mangling
these attributions and should leave them out and let the conversation
stand on its own, in the abstract." But then I thought "Nah, I think
I got this right" --- only I was apparently wrong.
> On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 14:49, Tom Lord wrote:
> > Charles (?):
> > >>> But this is exactly what creates stale branches. 8-)
>
> Below is *me*, not Florian
> > Florian:
> > >> I think those are called "history".
>
> likewise myself below:
> > :-)
> > >> Storing history is generally considered a feature in a revision
control
> > >> system.
>
> And below is Florian, not myself.
> > Charles:
> > > But usually, you also expect that the system provides some notion
of a
> > > HEAD branch. Historic branches are just confusing.
Sorry.
-t