[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US
From: |
Pierce T . Wetter III |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:44:22 -0700 |
http://www.eac.gov/annualreport_2003.htm#sec1
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) requires the
establishment of an Election Assistance Commission (EAC) headed
by four commissioners, who are appointed by the President.
The HAVA was what set in motion the current e-voting craze, I believe.
And the EAC seem rather wedded to e-voting, Diebold-style. :-( Is this
the kind of statement we want to see from a body entrusted with
"helping"
states to conduct elections?
"Most importantly, the proposals requiring a voter-verified paper
record would force voters with disabilities to go back to
using ballots that provide neither privacy nor independence, thereby
subverting a hallmark of the HAVA legislation. There must be
voter confidence in the accuracy of an electronic tally. However, the
current proposals would do nothing to ensure greater trust in
vote tabulations."
The final sentence is the one I find Orwellian.
A more frighteningly ignorant and/or duplicitous statement on e-voting
I have never heard. Everyone who cares about democracy should be
concerned at these type of attitudes (which seem to be depressingly
common among elections officials in the US). As one Slashdot wag put
it:
"I wonder if they'd let me take control of their personal finances
without a paper record - because the paper record would do
nothing to ensure greater trust in the financial calculations."
Isn't that a valid analogy? I think it is.
Voting is kind of an interesting problem from a theoretical standpoint.
1. It must be anonymous.
2. It must be hard (nothing is impossible) to "game".
3. It must be "countable" in a timely fashion.
Since the debacle in Florida, people have wanted to add:
4. People want a method to confirm how they voted without any of the
previous
precepts...
But that's tough. As far as paper records go, in my industry
(financial) the
paper records are almost useless, because getting 1400 individual
pieces of
paper a day is overwhelming. There are plenty of financial transactions
that
are purely electronic. In fact, those 1400 archaic pieces of paper are
based on
transactions that were purely electronic. Where are we going to store
those
50,000,000 pieces of paper we would generate each election?
Either they do not understand even the more elementary problems (and
there
are many problems, some elementary, some subtle) with current paperless
e-voting systems... or they are actively and knowingly complicit in the
electronic corruption of the election process!
Hard to say from that small sentence. There is nothing "magic" about
paper that
prevents cheating. I could develop a voting system that produced pieces
of paper
that correctly reported how the voter voted, yet recorded something
entirely
different. To catch it, you'd have to correlate all the pieces of paper
with
the final results, which would involve manually counting 50,000,000
pieces of paper.
What happens if the polling place runs out of toner? Can no one vote
then?
I should say, I'm perfectly content with the punch cards we use in
Arizona. It
would be nice if there was an addition where I could insert the card
into a
reader, and it would display how I voted, but the card (chad's and all)
is good enough
for me.
And remember, just because someone's Black, doesn't mean they're
automatically
a "good guy", or automatically care about racial
disenfranchisement.[1] Really,
that's obvious to a five year old, but Pierce seems to tacitly assume
this.
Likewise, just because a commision is "bipartisan" (Oh! So it's got
Republicrats
and Demopublicans! How wide and all-encompassing a spectrum of opinion
is that!
We clearly have nothing to fear!) doesn't automatically imply it's
neutral.
The frightening quotation above demonstrates that bipartisan
commissions -
gasp, even when Black people sit on them! - can come to the wrong
conclusions.
Ah, but I have a much easier task. I don't have to prove that the EAC
is:
1. Good
2. The right people to have the power to postpone an election.
3. Doing the right thing with regards to voting machines.
4. Black people care about racial disenfranchisement.
I merely have to prove that:
* We're not descending into Fascism run by Tom Ridge.
I think I did that two ways:
* Tom misread the article, its the EAC, not the DHS, and ultimately
Congress would have to decide how/when/why.
* The decision would have to be made by a bipartisan commission,
which is
how EVERY OTHER DECISION IN OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS IS MADE! (Ever
worked
in a polling place?)
So I think that while its worth watching what happens when Congress
decides
this issue to make sure they get it right, we're not descending into
fascism.
Pierce
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Neil Thompson, 2004/07/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] America, Land of Contradictions, Ron Parker, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Scott Parish, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Tom Lord, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Samium Gromoff, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Robin Green, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US,
Pierce T . Wetter III <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2004/07/12
[Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Tom Lord, 2004/07/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, John Seifarth, 2004/07/19