gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --forward mostly harmless


From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] --forward mostly harmless
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:13:48 -0700 (PDT)

One third way is to revive a proper and ambitious development project
for GNU patch.   Not sure it'd be worth it, personally.   Perhaps
there is another third way.

-t


    > X-42-Pre-Check: Attempted
    > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:02:04 -0400
    > From: address@hidden (James Blackwell)
    > X-BeenThere: address@hidden
    > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
    > Precedence: list
    > List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish 
<gnu-arch-users.gnu.org>
    > List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
    >   <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/gnu-arch-users>
    > List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
    >   <mailto:address@hidden>
    > Sender: address@hidden
    > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64-42mail (2004-01-11) on 
    >   mail.42inc.com
    > X-Spam-DCC: SPAMCHECK.NET: mail 1168; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
    > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
autolearn=ham 
    >   version=2.64-42mail
    > X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
    > X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    > X-UIDL: b1bc589328cd7cefa81799aebf81fa47
    > 
    > 
    > Patrick Mauritz: 
    > > an alternative could be to import patch into tla as library and do the
    > > necessary tweaks there - a libpatch might be necessary to
    > > significantly boost tla/win32's performance anyway.
    > 
    > Occasionally I have the same feeling. I usually get over the feeling
    > pretty quick when I consider two of the ramifications:
    > 
    > 1. the codebase for tla would grow substantially and
    > 
    > 2. We open ourselves to breaking one of our tenant contracts with the
    > users -- that archives and changesets are "transparent". If we start 
    > using our very own diff, patch, gzip and tar, we open up to the nasty
    > possibility of divergeance. 
    > 
    > 
    > -- 
    > James Blackwell          Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
    > Smile more!              each person you meet a compliment!
    > 
    > GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Gnu-arch-users mailing list
    > address@hidden
    > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
    > 
    > GNU arch home page:
    > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
    > 
    > 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]