[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla Debian unstable
From: |
Eric Wong |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla Debian unstable |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:40:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
Zenaan Harkness <address@hidden> wrote:
> Which tla should I use for Debian unstable?:
>
> 1) deb http://des.petta-tech.bogomips.org/~eric/debian/ ./
> - This is currently in my apt-sources (I think that was what was used to
> be recommended, I assume I got it off web page/ wiki/ ML).
Nope. That's mostly custom packages for myself since I'm all over the
place and want a central distribution point for custom stuff I bring up
for myself. I'm not sure how you got that address, but I use a
different path for MusicPD stuff that I *want* people to use.
You're more than welcome to use my custom packages since it's all under
a Free license but since I increment versions/epoches out of laziness
(dpkg holds/apt pins are a pain), it could screw up your versioning
system. I think the tla there is Aaron Bentley's writethrough (since
that's what I'm using right now), but other stuff may break on you and I
don't want that. Besides, I'm not remotely a DD.
Only the MusicPD stuff is really checked/advertised/meant for other
people to use.
> 2) deb http://people.debian.org/~asuffield/daily/tla/lord/ ./
>
> 3) deb http://people.debian.org/~asuffield/daily/tla/integration/ ./
> - 2) and 3) are the daily bleeding edge from the wiki - I don't use NFS,
> so perhaps I don't need 3)
>
> 4) default Debian archive - does this work for unstable? the wiki refers
> to sid/testing
--
Eric Wong
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla Debian unstable, John Meinel, 2004/09/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla Debian unstable, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla Debian unstable, James Blackwell, 2004/09/16