Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bazaar 1.3 preview

[Mikhael Goikhman]

I didn't try baz 1.3 preview, but I would like to know about the status
of several issues.

1) Don't you think "tree-id" command is misnamed? Use "tree-rev" name
if you feel "tree-revision" is not short enough (I don't feel so).

2) The flat-revision subdirectory structure in ~/.arch-cache leads to
huge directories, this is not scalable. Is not version/patchlevel
structure more balanced and more consistent?

3) Is the problem of mixed stdout and stderr in some commands fixed?
(For example, in commit after import, half of "* messages" go to stdout
and half to stderr.) The tla behaviour is better; stderr is for errors.

Regards,
Mikhael.