[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 May 2005 21:28:55 -0000 |
Hi,
I've just experienced what looks to be #385:
$ baz merge address@hidden/emacs-snapshot-debian--devo--0
* build reference tree for
address@hidden/emacs-snapshot-debian--devo--0--patch-3
* Scanning for full-tree revision: Key for signature missing - cannot verify
signature (212B306C9396865D)
.......
* from archive cached: address@hidden/emacs-snapshot-debian--dgms--0--base-0
* Applying 5 revisions: .....
Searching for best merge point
.. done
* merge by
delta(address@hidden/emacs-snapshot-debian--main--0--patch-3,address@hidden/emacs-s
napshot-debian--devo--0--patch-3)[/home/jerome/pkg/emacs-snapshot/debian]
* performing merge
/build/buildd/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/namespace.c:437:botched invariant
arch_valid_package_name (name, arch_maybe_archive, arch_req_package, 1)
PANIC: exiting on botched invariant
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
- [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?,
Jérôme Marant <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/20