[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4? |
Date: |
Thu, 05 May 2005 20:15:17 +1000 |
On Wed, 1969-12-31 at 23:59 +0000, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just experienced what looks to be #385:
> /build/buildd/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/namespace.c:437:botched invariant
> arch_valid_package_name (name, arch_maybe_archive, arch_req_package, 1)
> PANIC: exiting on botched invariant
namespace.c:437 is pretty useless for identifying panics :[. Could you
install bazaar-dbg (from the distro of your choice), and run baz under
gdb ?
$ gdb --args baz <arguments here>
> break panic
> r
> bt
and mail me the resulting backtrace? That will tell me what the cause
is.
Cheers,
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/20