[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?
From: |
Robert Widhopf-Fenk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 May 2005 23:20:28 +0200 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 22:04:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > namespace.c:437 is pretty useless for identifying panics :[. Could
> > you install bazaar-dbg (from the distro of your choice), and run
> > baz under gdb ?
> >
> > $ gdb --args baz <arguments here>
> >> break panic
> >> r
> >> bt
> >
> > and mail me the resulting backtrace? That will tell me what the
> > cause is.
>
> Sorry for the very late reply, but I've been trying to reproduce the
> problem without any success.
Well I can, and there seem to be two problems, the last few
times I merged on those two trees baz was working without any
problems and I did not change anything except doing "baz
upgrade" and adding some signing rules.
Unfortunately tla now does not find the archives anymore due
to baz upgrade ;-/, I need to reregister them.
~/<1>arched/xtla--main--1.1 > gdb --args baz merge
address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(gdb) break panic
Breakpoint 1 at 0x80bed1c: file
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c, line 43.
(gdb) r
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1212424064 (LWP 11573)]
Guessing archive format as tla 1.0. This is normal with old archives, you can
ignore it unless other errors occur.
Guessing archive format as tla 1.0. This is normal with old archives, you can
ignore it unless other errors occur.
* build reference tree for address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19
* Scanning for full-tree revision: ...................................
* from revision library: address@hidden/xtla--main--0.9--patch-51
* Applying 34 revisions: ..................................
Searching for best merge point
... done
* merge by
delta(address@hidden/xtla--jet--0.9--patch-31,address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1--patch-19)[/home/fenk/prog/arched/xtla--main--1.1]
* build reference tree for address@hidden/xtla--jet--0.9--patch-31
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/build-revision.c:211:botched invariant
my_arch != 0
[Switching to Thread -1212424064 (LWP 11573)]
Breakpoint 1, panic (str=0x80f73c1 "exiting on botched invariant") at
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c:43
43 /building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c: Datei oder
Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.
in /building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c
(gdb) bt
#0 panic (str=0x80f73c1 "exiting on botched invariant") at
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c:43
#1 0x080bef1a in invariant_test (condition=0, str=0x80ed150 "my_arch != 0",
file=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, line=1) at
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/hackerlab/bugs/panic.c:109
#2 0x08080e53 in arch_build_revision (dest_dir=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of
bounds>, arch=0x0, archive=0x8643690 "address@hidden", revision=0x1 <Address
0x1 out of bounds>,
cache_dir=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>) at
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/build-revision.c:211
#3 0x08098c9e in arch_find_or_make_tmp_local_copy (chatter_fd=1,
tmp_dir=0x817ad18
"/home/fenk/prog/arched/xtla--main--1.1/,,merge.1116536953.11573.13",
tree_root=0x8331550
"/home/fenk/prog/arched/xtla--main--1.1/,,merge.1116536953.11573.13/,,address@hidden",
cache_dir_default=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, arch=0x1,
archive=0x8643690 "address@hidden", revision=0x84c3138
"xtla--jet--0.9--patch-31")
at /building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/local-cache.c:281
#4 0x080a0395 in arch_star_merge (chatter_fd=1, from_arch=0x0,
from_archive=0x819f730 "address@hidden",
from_revision=0x8588920
"h/;\b`\232\212\bnk/prog/arched/xetla--main--1.1-steve-youngs",
to_tree=0x8136270, to_arch=0x0, to_archive=0x8135108 "address@hidden",
to_version=0x0,
cache_dir=0x819ec68 "/home/fenk/prog/arched", changeset_output=0x0,
use_diff3=1, forward=1, escape_classes=82080, show_points_only=0,
graph_merge=1, trace=0)
at /building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/libarch/merge.c:774
#5 0x080569a9 in arch_cmd_merge (program_name=0x8134008 "baz merge", argc=2,
argv=0x819f328) at /building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/commands/merge.c:335
#6 0x0804a885 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbffff8d4) at
/building/bazaar-1.3.2/src/baz/baz/baz.c:139
#7 0xb7e35974 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#8 0x0804a331 in _start () at ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:102
~/<1>arched/xtla--main--1.1 > cat \{arch}/++default-version
address@hidden/xtla--main--1.1
~/<1>arched/xtla--main--1.1 > baz -V
baz Bazaar version 1.3.2 (address@hidden/dists--bazaar--1.3[bazaar--devo.cfg])
from Canonical Ltd. and other members of the arch community
Copyright 2004,2005 Canonical Ltd.
Copyright 2003 Tom Lord.
Copyright 2003-2005 Various Contributors
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report bugs to address@hidden
Bazaar version 1.3.2 (address@hidden/dists--bazaar--1.3[bazaar--devo.cfg])
- [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?,
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/20