Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch commit on large trees ?

[Jan Hudec]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 14:02:18 -0700, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 22:47 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> > "Philippe Moutarlier" <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > baz inventory -s | wc -l
> > >
> > > 22133 files
> > 
> > With that size of project, you should split your project into several
> > smaller ones, and use, for example, configurations (see baz
> > build-config) to manage the nested projects.
> > 
> > I'm not 100% happy with the way configuration work, but it's probably
> > the best way to scale up with arch.
> > 
> 
> I am trying to be as little disruptive from the way things are organized
> in CVS right now. I'll give a look to see how difficult it would be. 

Given that tla development is stopped and bazaar is going to be replaced with
bazaar-ng anyway, I'd suggest you look at the three newest version control
system -- git/cogito, mercurial and bazaar-ng, whether you can switch to any
of them, instead of arch.

--
                                                 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec 
<address@hidden>

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature