[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users
From: |
Matthew Hannigan |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 03:00:15 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Toby White wrote:
> But it's not Linux I'm worried about - anything will compile on a Linux
> by and large if you're prepared to upgrade packages. My problem is
> that I want to run arch/tla/baz on other Unix OSes. As I say, this
> was fine with tla, since all I needed was the bare gnu essentials,
> plus an ANSI C compiler.
I made a statically compiled baz, bundled with it's own binaries
of the required programs for old linuxes and a solaris at work.
I intend(1) to clean this up a bit and check that it least compiles
out of the box on solaris, (any) old linux and hp-ux. Hopefully this
would solve your problems.
Matt
1. intend, as in no promises no timeline.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Toby White, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Aaron Bentley, 2005/09/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, Fredrik Lundh, 2005/09/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, Martin Pool, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Ludovic Courtès, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Jan Hudec, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Matthieu MOY, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', James Blackwell, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Andrew Suffield, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, John A Meinel, 2005/09/09