[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users
|
From: |
Fredrik Lundh |
|
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 18:51:51 +0200 |
Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Ironically, one of the reasons we started requiring 2.4 (we previously
> required 2.3) was that 2.4 has the subprocess module, which makes
> crossplatform compatibility a lot better.
the subprocess module is available for 2.2 and 2.3 as well (it's pure
python on unixes, a binary extension is needed for windows), and has
a very tolerant license, so you can ship it with BZR if you want to.
</F>
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Toby White, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Aaron Bentley, 2005/09/08
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users,
Fredrik Lundh <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users, Martin Pool, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Ludovic Courtès, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Jan Hudec, 2005/09/09
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', Matthieu MOY, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Rationale for `revc' and `bzr', James Blackwell, 2005/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, Andrew Suffield, 2005/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The future of GNU Arch users, John A Meinel, 2005/09/09