[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird 'tla changes' behaviour
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird 'tla changes' behaviour |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:09:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:45:50AM +0200, John A Meinel wrote:
> What version of tla? 1.3 had a couple of known memory corruption
> errors (de-allocating invalid memory). I *think* those got fixed as
> of 1.3.3, but I think they were still there in 1.3.1.
Just FYI: 1.3.3, says the Debian package.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:30:40PM +1000, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Also try running memtest86 on your system, and try stressing it by
> building a couple of linux kernel trees in parallel. If these fail,
> it's a strong indication of hardware problems.
I'm running memtest86 right now, and indeed, there's a single address
up around the 240 meg region that hasn't passed a single test. Looks
like that was probably the culprit. Guess I'll see about finding the
kernel BadMem patch. :)
Thanks everyone.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature