Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch: automatic remove the corrupt revlib revision, second try

[Andy Tai]

Look, the patch is still under discussion.  I am not ignoring the opinions of 
everyone, especially
not Tom.  The patch is not accepted yet; I indicated that I want the opinions 
of people.  The
current majority opinion does not favor the patch in the current form; and 
anything Tom does not
like would be considered twice, if not three times or more.

Andy

--- "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> wrote:

> >>>>> "Derek" == Derek Zhou <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>     Derek> Addressing Matthieu's concern. Now it prints a warning
>     Derek> message. Also does a rename before the rm.
> 
> *sigh* Another good project succumbs to CADT syndrome.  Now even tla
> developers ignore Tom.  Whut a revoltin' dervelopment.
> 
> Look, the warning idea is provably wrong.  Proof is by induction on
> users interested in seeing it.  The idea of the patch is dubious at
> best from the point of view of most users of tla, but the author
> clearly doesn't consider that interesting.  Same goes for earlier
> patches from the same source.  The Eight-Ball sez: Outlook cloudy.
> 
> 
> -- 
> School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
> University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN


>