[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:20:37 -0800 |
Alfred:
>> You simply don't understand it do you? The changes in baz's UI were
>> simple removal, addition and changing the default of _some_ options,
>> nothing more. Get over it.
James:
> The veracity of this statement can be easily measured by performing a
> simple test: diff the gnuarch 1.2.1 and Bazaar 1.4.1 trees. If the ?
> changes are few minor UI changes, then Alfred is deserving of respect
> and [yadda yadda yadda]
We could further evaluate those diffs for quality and also to ask
what the practical impact for users was (other than shoving *me*
aside). Alfred might come out pretty well, in that light.
You wanna talk about "get over it", James? Let's do then.
Get over it: you and canonical as a whole did harm to me
and the community. Mark gave you poorly designed incentives
which, in quite un-engineer-like fasion, you bit. Your company
is full of shit when it paints itself as a friend of the community.
Own it.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough,
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, James Blackwell, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Jose E. Marchesi, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Miles Bader, 2006/01/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] pigs at trough, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/01/17