Re: [Gnu-arch-users] contributors' licensing conditions

[James Blackwell]

Andy,

I would probably be remiss if I didn't mention that the Wiki is
specifically licensed GPLv2. The archives will have more details
concerning as to who* and why&.  I believe its effectively impossible for
the wiki license to change to v2 or later, though I would be happy if such
a possibility existed.

Regards,
James

* I'm the perp.

& At the time that I set up the wiki I did not consider the GFDL as a free
  license (still don't, actually). I was concerned that later versions of 
  the GPL could potentially have similiar issues (I no longer hold this
  view).


On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:28:31PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> Hi, the first draft of the GNU GPL v3 has been released and I like what I
> see.  In light of this I just want to explicitly ensure that new
> contributors to tla know that you allow the licensing of your code to be
> under the GNU GPL v2 or any later version of the GNU GPL as published by the
> Free Software Foundation.  (Tom's code has been assigned to the FSF so the
> majority of the code in tla shall be of no problem. )
> 
> So, as a note, if you send source code patches in for tla,  you give the
> permission for this licensing condition :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Andy

> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

-- 
James Blackwell's home :  http://jblack.linuxguru.net
Gnupg 06357400   F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature