gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] contributors' licensing conditions


From: James Blackwell
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] contributors' licensing conditions
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:28:32 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:30:33PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >>>>> "James" == James Blackwell <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>     James> Yes, software can have bugs, and licenses can have bugs
>     James> too. This draft has at least three significant bugs and two
>     James> dozen minor ones. Thats ok though, because this is not a
>     James> license -- its a first draft.
> 
> That's not OK in software, and I doubt it's any more OK in law.  Every
> draft should be treated as though it were going to be used by real
> people.

Are you suggesting that the GPLv3 drafts should worked on in secret?

-- 
James Blackwell's home :  http://jblack.linuxguru.net
Gnupg 06357400   F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]