Re: [GNU-linux-libre] chromium not free?

[Quiliro Ordóñez]

El 23/03/11 10:25, crap0101 escribió:
> Il giorno mer, 23/03/2011 alle 09.42 -0500, Quiliro Ordóñez ha scritto:
> > Thank you very much people.
> >
> > I now have a clearer panorama. Can conclude (as of the info provided)
> > that Debian and Ubuntu introduce a lot of files/licencing changes in
> > Chromium that are not on the source of Chromium?
> I don't think debian/ubuntu introduce anything.
> the changelog posted by Rubén try to enumerate every licence/copyright
> notice found in the source, but most are marked as 'unknown' because
> they haven't (this not mean those files are not free by dafault, but
> probably needs to be checked out).

Thanks for the info Crap0101.

> For example, two files marked as unknown:
>
> #-------#
> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/base/third_party/purify/pure.h?view=markup
> #-------#
>
> /*
>   * Header file of Pure API function declarations.
>   *
> * (C) Copyright IBM Corporation. 2006, 2006. All Rights Reserved.
>     *   You may recompile and redistribute these definitions as required.

Does this mean you cannot have the freedom to modify this information 
file? If this is the case, then it is not free.