Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Trademark licenses, example in Firefox

[Diego Saravia]

> While projects like linux-libre and icecat are not the legal copyright
> holder of the source isn't relevant to us; the licence they are
> distributed under gives us the permission we need. (No one entity holds
> all the copyright to Linux either).

yes, nobody says that you dont have the right to distribute.

the point is that what you distribute are not: "the sources"

> Saying we don't have source code because we are not the originator of
> the project is a logical fallacy.

I am not speaking about "have", con can get the real sources, from
original project.


> Not sure what you were getting at there.

the true.