Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Trademark licenses, example in Firefox

[Karl Goetz]

On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:51:03 -0300
Diego Saravia <address@hidden> wrote:

> > While projects like linux-libre and icecat are not the legal
> > copyright holder of the source isn't relevant to us; the licence
> > they are distributed under gives us the permission we need. (No one
> > entity holds all the copyright to Linux either).
> 
> yes, nobody says that you dont have the right to distribute.
> 
> the point is that what you distribute are not: "the sources"
> 
> > Saying we don't have source code because we are not the originator
> > of the project is a logical fallacy.
> 
> I am not speaking about "have", con can get the real sources, from
> original project.
> 
> 
> > Not sure what you were getting at there.
> 
> the true.

Maybe, but I'm certainly not able to find it in your comments - perhaps
there is simply misunderstanding involved.
Personally, I'm not interested in pursuing this any further, as history
suggests we won't come to an agreement :)
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature