[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Ututo status
|
From: |
Ineiev |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Ututo status |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:27:29 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:06:16AM -0300, coadde wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 08:29 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote:
> >
> > The website is still alive.
But it says the distro is dead, doesn't it (I'm no Spanish speaker, sorry)?
> > Perhaps it would be better if the distro
> > is on a secondary level, let's say in a separate table or in a separate
> > entry from GNU site, the intention would be to add a brief note about
> > the maintainer ship. Thus, the site of GNU does not lose the historical
> > record of free/libre distributions, perhaps attracting people interested
> > in the future can take care of the distro.
>
> +1 I think stable free distros should be added in a separated table and
> we add a campaign to encourage users to help maintain and improve those
> unmaintained free distros.
On the other hand, they'd better (and it's much easier to) join
an active free distro.
> Even, we should check another free distros such as BLAG, Dyne:bolic and
> Musix since seems there aren't activities in their web sites, mailing
> lists, etc.
As far as I understand, these distros don't claim they are unmaintained;
moreover, it seems to me there is some ongoing work.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature