[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation
|
From: |
Ineiev |
|
Subject: |
[GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:05:50 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hello,
Ali Abdul Ghani, Uruk GNU/Linux developer (CCed), submitted
that distro for evaluation.
So far, we identified an issue with distribution channels: Uruk
GNU/Linux has no its own repositories; Ali suggested some solution,
but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable; I hope Ali will explain it
here.
Thank you!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation,
Ineiev <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/28