[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation
|
From: |
Jaromil |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation |
|
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2016 14:44:23 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Jaro Mail <https://www.dyne.org/software/jaromail> |
dear Ineiev,
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Ineiev wrote:
> So far, we identified an issue with distribution channels: Uruk
> GNU/Linux has no its own repositories; Ali suggested some solution,
> but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable; I hope Ali will explain it
> here.
can you explain why it should be an issue for an 100% free distro to
not have its own repositories?
ciao
- [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation,
Jaromil <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28