[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation
From: |
Ali Abdul Ghani |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:48:15 -0700 |
hi
We don't have a so Great server to do that.
Because Can't buy something from the internet in Iraq
we have small Server(30gp)
its Donate by Someone
in this time we have 2 solution
- push the fixs Directly to trisquel
- make Small repository to core packages
have fun and be free
ali miracle
2016-06-24 8:05 جرينتش-07:00, Ineiev <address@hidden>:
> Hello,
>
> Ali Abdul Ghani, Uruk GNU/Linux developer (CCed), submitted
> that distro for evaluation.
>
> So far, we identified an issue with distribution channels: Uruk
> GNU/Linux has no its own repositories; Ali suggested some solution,
> but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable; I hope Ali will explain it
> here.
>
> Thank you!
>
--
Emacs is the ground. We run around and act silly on top of it, and
when we die, may our remnants grace its ongoing incrementation.
- [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation,
Ali Abdul Ghani <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/26
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28