[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 23:13:47 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello, Ali,
On Mar 24, 2023, alimiracle <alimiracle@riseup.net> wrote:
> These requirements were developed in order not to use repositories
> from non-free distributions
I don't speak for the FSF and I don't know exactly what motivated the
inclusion of this requirement in the FSDG, but I can think of reasons
that go beyond what you suggest above:
- free distros need to take responsibility for what they recommend and
offer to users, outsourcing that responsibility to third parties, even
ones committed to observing the same rules, is a potential pitfall when
an upstream distribution changes its own alignment. A free distro must
be able to fix freedom problems itself, without depending on a third
party to do so.
- if an upstream distribution changes its alignment, the downstream
distro may find itself needing to urgently find hosting for a sizable
repository. that creates a potential conflict of priorities. it pays
to work on that ahead of time.
- self hosting one's own computing and data sets a good example for the
community at large. the growing disregard for this aspect of computing
autonomy in parts of the larger free software communities is a serious
problem that drives a lot of people into behaviors that promote
dependency rather than freedom.
There is likely a lot more, but these are ones that come to mind
immediately.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
- [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/23
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, tct, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, alimiracle, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/29
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review of uruk, bill-auger, 2023/03/31
- [GNU-linux-libre] FSDG interpretations Was: review of uruk, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/03/29
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] FSDG interpretations, Ineiev, 2023/03/30
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] FSDG interpretations, bill-auger, 2023/03/31