[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine

Subject: Re: Commercial code is better: Cedega VS Wine
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:29:47 -0600
User-agent: slrn/ (Debian)

On 2006-03-10, billwg <> wrote:
> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <> wrote in message 
>> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:31:15 +0000, billwg wrote:
>>> "Kelsey Bjarnason" <> wrote in message
>>>> That's nice.  I'm forced to conclude you can't actually support your
>>>> statement, in light of a concrete counter example, so you're 
>>>> admitting
>>>> you
>>>> were, in fact, spewing complete crap.
>>> Well you didn't read far enough, kelsey.  You missed the part where
>> Where you actually demonstrated how XP is faster, cheaper, more 
>> reliable,
>> more flexible, more powerful than Debian, the failure of which would 
>> be
>> the admission your assertion about commercial software having to be 
>> better
>> was complete bullshit?
>> You're right; I did miss that part.  It wasn't there.
>> Do feel free to point it out, though.
> Well, kelsey, you are obviously hopeless, but consider that the 
> consumers don't see it that way.  They see linux as a cheapo substitute 

        Oh pulleeeze.

        They don't even percieve Linux.


        OTOH, DELL will gladly sell you a beefed up PC running Linux
and 60K per cpu server software. They will even stake their own 
reputation on it.

        Much like a Diesel F-350, Linux is a workhorse system that
the average consumer likely has no appreciation. Even if it is an
Eddie Bauer variant.

     If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of           |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either.  / | \

 Posted Via Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]