Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.5

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

Qua, 2006-07-05 às 15:47 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > You refuse to answer this simple question? I merely want to understand
> > you better...
> 
> Intellectual property is, without question, property. See Stewart v. 
> Abend, 495 U.S. 207, 219 (1990), Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 
> 986 (1984), etc. I respect your right to be stupid. 42 is the answer 
> to life, the universe, and everything.

So I guess I'll take that as a yes.

So if you think that way, why doesn't it, in Wallace vs FSF, have any
value when the Judge says the GNU GPL fosters innovation?

Rui

signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente