[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux

From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Subject: Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 08:31:06 +0000

Seg, 2006-11-06 às 07:59 +0100, Merijn de Weerd escreveu:
> On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <> wrote:
> > We still believe that we will be the dominant player in the Linux 
> > market, because by that time there won't be any other Linux players. 
> > ------
> >
> > Hm... is this an invitation for Wallace to file another action under 
> > Sherman Act 2 monopolization (in addition to his current section 1 
> > action)?
> This is stupid even for you. There's nothing illegal about
> having a dominant position in a market. It's the *abuse*
> of the dominant position that's illegal.

And it is stupid to talk of monopoly when anyone can join in, in Free

Maybe you can't work for Red Hat, but you surely can sell support for
Red Hat (or RH based) operating systems.

Yes, support that goes to the level of source code changes (just look at
Oracle and their stupid act... they are just like CentOS but they're
doing it in an Oracle way -- broken).


+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]