[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:12:04 +0100 |
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
>
> On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> > Merijn de Weerd wrote:
> >> On 2006-11-06, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> >> > We still believe that we will be the dominant player in the Linux
> >> > market, because by that time there won't be any other Linux players.
> >> > ------
> >> >
> >> > Hm... is this an invitation for Wallace to file another action under
> >> > Sherman Act 2 monopolization (in addition to his current section 1
> >
> > ------
> > Section 2. Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
>
> Like I said, stupid even for you. Do you know the difference
> between 'dominant' and 'monopolizing'?
Feel free to illuminate me (the context being "there won't be any other
Linux players").
regards,
alexander.
Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/03
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/03
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/06
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/11/06
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/06
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/06
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/11/06
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
Message not availableRe: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/06
Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/06
Message not availableRe: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/06
Re: Competing Robin Hood Linux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/06