|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:17:47 -0500 |
"Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message news:haEql.53381$cI2.43976@newsfe09.iad...
They are accessed via the Verizon webserver. What difference would it make if they were somehow linked behind the scenes to some server owned by another company. Do you seriously believe that is the case? It would be very unusual for Verizon to have back office direct connections to Actiontec.On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:41:17 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:None of the above demonstrate that the file(s) are stored on Verizon servers, the files could be hosted on Actiontek servers.With a URL of download.Verizon.net? Perhaps their servers could be linked behind the scenes, but that would be rather unusual at best. Why would they do that in lieu of just storing a copy of the download file?The point is that you've not demonstrated that the files are stored on a verizon server yet proceed as if you have.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |