[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

From: amicus_curious
Subject: Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:17:47 -0500

"Thufir Hawat" <> wrote in message news:haEql.53381$cI2.43976@newsfe09.iad...
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:41:17 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

None of the above demonstrate that the file(s) are stored on Verizon
servers, the files could be hosted on Actiontek servers.

With a URL of  Perhaps their servers could be
linked behind the scenes, but that would be rather unusual at best.  Why
would they do that in lieu of just storing a copy of the download file?

The point is that you've not demonstrated that the files are stored on a
verizon server yet proceed as if you have.

They are accessed via the Verizon webserver. What difference would it make if they were somehow linked behind the scenes to some server owned by another company. Do you seriously believe that is the case? It would be very unusual for Verizon to have back office direct connections to Actiontec.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]