Re: The GFDL is _not_ a public license, says dak

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/8/2010 11:49 AM, RJack wrote:
> > Sigh... I guess I'll just leave that argument to you and your
> > agents to try on a federal judge in a copyright infringement case
> > Hyman.
>
> Yes, exactly. Even if you were correct about downstream distributors
> not having authorization to distribute, which you are not, before
> this could be a court issue the rights holders would have to sue the
> downstream distributors for copyright infringement.



> Since the rights holders want this distribution to occur, as
> evidenced by using the GPL as the license, this will never happen.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...


Keep spinnin' Hyman -- it won't help -- but keep spinnin' anyway.

Sincerely,
RJack