[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Significance of the GP licence.

From: RJack
Subject: Re: Significance of the GP licence.
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 08:11:59 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20100228)

David Kastrup wrote:
RJack <> writes:

David Kastrup wrote:
RJack <> writes:

OK I'm so fucking tired of this.

I use OpenBSD. I use GCC. Use GNU/Linux.

BSD is free. GPL is free.

Don't worry. The GPL license and the "Free Software" religion will soon reside in history's trashbin that contains Urban Legends.
A few people told RMS when he started.  Now it is a whole hissing
 and yelling bunch.  That they bother is the best proof that they
 are wrong. And they know it.

There are still a few nut-jobs out there in Cyberspace who believe the GPL is enforceable, even though the license requires that copyright permissions be licensed at "no charge to all third parties".

More relevantly, there are no judges out there in court rooms who believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored while making use of its permissions.

Please provide links to those US federal judges who *do not* "believe
the terms of the GPL can be ignored." I await with 'bated breath for
your documentation.

And that's what counts, regardless of where you think your nut-jobs may be hanging out.

RJack :)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]