[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:18 -0000 |
ZnU wrote:
[...]
> > Why should I believe that the GPL forms a condition precedent when
> > no one have ever demonstrated that it does so?
>
> Because a court found that the Artistic License did, and the language
> and mechanism through which the GPL grants permission to redistribute is
> similar.
Read also the PDF below. What do think about Appellee's arguments
against such a finding?
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/cafc-pi-1/Appellee_brief.pdf
("More importantly, while Katzer agrees that the "conditions" to
distribution and modifications use the phraseology associated with
"condition precedent" (i.e. "provided, that") Katzer...")
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, (continued)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08