[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stuttgart 21 protests

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Stuttgart 21 protests
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:04:23 -0000


Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [...]
> > carries a label such as "RB" or "RE".  I suspect a lot of councillors who
> > voted for this scheme were suffering the same confusion.  I agree, 160
> > trains a day would fit comfortably into an 8 platform station.  600
> > trains won't.
> Blah blah blah.
> The facts are that the planned theoretical maximum for S21 is 72 trains
> per hour with practical target around 50 per hour at maximum. The
> current peak hour utilization is around 47 trains per hour (that's
> according to the protesters -- I don't know if the count of 47 is not
> inflated). So the target of 51 is thus fully acceptable.

According to people in charge of running the railroad (live in SWR
Internet broadcast): 

The 2020 target for S21 is 64 trains per hour at practical maximum. The
current peak hour utilization is 54.


"Plaintiff Erik Andersen is a work-from-home father who has gifted 
to the world software underlying a significant body of consumer
electronics." ROFL
                     -- SFLC crooks Ravicher, Williamson, Spiegel
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]