[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnue] GL requirements for integration
From: |
^chewie |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnue] GL requirements for integration |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:19:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Todd Boyle wrote:
> If you would kindly read my comment more carefully!
>
> The issue is EDI as a *General Ledger standard*, not EDI itself.
> EDI interfaces should take their place among all the other business
> applications that generate GL data. It must be accommodated.
I would just love to see the use of the term EDI get dropped all
together. I've only had experience with EDIFACT/X.12 on a
business-to-business (B2B) basis. With that in mind, I didn't realize
the scope of your argument was General Ledger. Generally, I avoid
accounting like the plague, so I will safely disregard the rest of
this email and apologize for any misunderstandings. ;-)
--
Chad "^chewie, gunnarr" Walstrom <address@hidden>
http://wookimus.net/chewie
pgpuuCzxuGCaZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Gnue] RE: [xbrl-public] Requesting an official report on GL schema, Coffin, Zachary P, 2000/09/18
- Re: [Gnue] RE: [xbrl-public] Requesting an official report on GL schema, vio, 2000/09/18
- [Gnue] What is EDIFACT GL, Todd Boyle, 2000/09/18
- [Gnue] Re: [xbrl-public] What is EDIFACT GL, Robert Lemense, 2000/09/19
- [Gnue] RE: [xbrl-public] What is EDIFACT GL, Todd Boyle, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnue] RE: [xbrl-public] What is EDIFACT GL, ^chewie, 2000/09/20
- [Gnue] GL requirements for integration, Todd Boyle, 2000/09/20
- Re: [Gnue] GL requirements for integration,
^chewie <=
- GLR, GLT, and the memory array GL, Todd Boyle, 2000/09/22
- Re: GLR, GLT, and the memory array GL, Derek Neighbors, 2000/09/22
Re: [Gnue] RE: [xbrl-public] Requesting an official report on GL schema, Derek A. Neighbors, 2000/09/18