[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnugo-devel] Re: Revised tarball

From: Teun Burgers
Subject: [gnugo-devel] Re: Revised tarball
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:00:14 +0200

address@hidden wrote:

> Except the second extract_fuseki warning the other warnings seem to be 
> problems
> with the configure produced by autoconf 2.52 but harmless.
> For example The
> functions setlinebuf and usleep are defined in included files stdio.h and
> string.h only if __USE_BSD is defined. This is not defined yet HAVE_USLEEP and
> HAVE_SETLINEBUF are set in the config.h.

autoconf tests for availability for a function by linking against it.
If that succeeds it assumes a prototype is available. This assumption
generally works well, but is violated here.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]