gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests


From: Evan Berggren Daniel
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Evan's tests
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 12:58:46 -0400 (EDT)

I'll just go with as you've said.  I'm not sure what confused me earlier,
if it happens again I'll ask.

Thanks

Evan Daniel


On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Arend Bayer wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I got that part.  What I'm wondering about is the fact that
> >
> > #? [1 B19|E19]
> >
> > won't match
> >
> > = 2 B19 E19
>
> If you really got this line then you forgot the id in fron of the
> gtp command to be evaluated.
>
> > because there's no 1 to match.  Should I just drop the 1, as in
> >
> > #? [B19|E19]
> No, you always need the return code. Always use
> [1 (B19|E19)]
>
> if there are multiple ways to succed in an owl test without ko. Use
> [2 (A19|B17)]
> if there are multiple ways to succeed with KO_A,...
> I am not sure what your intention is with the above #? line. Also I am
> not sure whether you really got the above gtp response. Was that
> owl_threaten_attack?
>
> Arend
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]