[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result
From: |
Paul Pogonyshev |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:10:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.50 |
SP Lee wrote:
> Here is the replay result with gnugo 3.5.3 as white for the same game I
> posted earlier.
>
> ...
>
> Compared to the current cvs, gnugo 3.5.3 agreeed with gnugo 3.4 on move
> 38, 58, 96 and 138. The move 138 (life and death problem) is related to
> owl tuning, I think. So the owl tuning after 3.5.3 should be checked for
> the mistake of the current cvs on move 138. There is still a big mistake
> on move 218. So maybe the semeai changes from 3.4 to 3.5.3 should be
> checked.
How about your trying to check that?
Paul
- [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result,
Paul Pogonyshev <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, bump, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, bump, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/02/19