[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result
From: |
max-d |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:14:09 +0100 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "SP Lee" <address@hidden>
To: "GNU Go development" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result
> The move 138 (life and death problem) is related
> to
> owl tuning, I think.
i don't think so !
both GNUGo 3.4 and 3.5.3 gives just a 3.89 value to S15 (S10 is just a few
less)
md.
- [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result,
max-d <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, SP Lee, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, bump, 2004/02/18
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, max-d, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, bump, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, Evan Daniel, 2004/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern proposal [was]Twogtp test replay result, bump, 2004/02/19