[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions About GNUmed DataBase
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Questions About GNUmed DataBase |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:26:14 +0100 |
> > > Thanks for your time and effort, by this way you have mentioned we
> think
> > > this will caused lots of data redundancy
> >
> > Why do you think that ?
> >
> > What are you referring to by "this" ?
> >
> > > and would effect on performance of database if we want to check the
> > > constrains, is it true or not?
> >
>
> As long as the query is joining on indexed values, then performance should
> not be a problem. Unless the redundant data needs to be maintained ...
Hint: there is nearly no redundant data in the GNUmed database schema
(that I know of) - I am trying to make them *think* - after all, it's
a database *class* ... ;-)
> causing
> a) multiple queries to update and b) a maintenance nightmare. I don't know
> the GNUMed db schema to comment if this is the case. Sometimes you need to
> index the index if the data grows quite large.
I don't think PostgreSQL supports that as a builtin. GNUmed likely
won't need it either.
> I've never performed SVT on GNUMed, but it would be a worthwhile exercise
> if
> you would like to try. Load up the DB with lots of data and try running
> some
> scenarios. Has anyone performed SVT on GNUMed in the past? What were the
> results like?
The one thing I did test back in the days (64 MB RAM, PG 7.1) was to
search for a patient among about 150k records. That was
near instantaneous.
Karasten
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01