Re[6]: EOKeyValueCoding

[Manuel Guesdon]

On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:49:09 +0100 Helge Hess <address@hidden> wrote:

 >| On Sonntag, Februar 24, 2002, at 07:55  Uhr, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
 >| >> | This isn't an issue any more. We should place a KVC implementation in
 >| >> | FoundationExt if we want to support deprecated OS's like OPENSTEP.
 >| >> | Indeed because KVC is part of Foundation it's much easier now, since 
 >| >> you
 >| >> | don't need to maintain runtime specific code in GDL :-)
 >| >
 >| > I agree :-) on the last sentence but in this case, why putting "base 
 >| > KVC" in FoundationExt an not base  ?
 >| 
 >| As I wrote, to support old Foundations which do *not* have KVC in 
 >| Foundation (like the Foundation of OPENSTEP). I would *copy* the code 
 >| over to FoundationExt (so it's contained in both libraries).

You're right. I've forgotten this one.


Manuel

--
______________________________________________________________________
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <address@hidden>
14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement  -  93200 Saint-Denis  -  France
Tel: +33 1 4940 0999  -  Fax: +33 1 4940 0998