[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge th
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:41 +0000 |
On 24 Jan 2012, at 12:04, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> Riccardo,
>
> Well, without libxml2 none of the NSXML* classes or GSXML classes will
> work.
Apart from NSXMLParser (which works fine without it), this is accurate.
> I believe that nib reading will also cease to function,
Maybe ... I haven't checked ... I thought it used NSXMLParser, and thus doesn't
need libxml2.
> we
> won't be able to read XML based plists either. I believe it already
> is a hard dependency at this point. I'll need to check by removing
> it from my system when I have the chance to do that.
>
> In any case, I see no problem with it being a hard dependency or with
> putting it in prior to FOSDEM given that the existing classes have
> never worked.
I prefer it as a semi-hard dependency ... we should build without it, but the
classes which need it should just fail upon initialisation.
- NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Gregory Casamento, 2012/01/23
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Ivan Vučica, 2012/01/23
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/01/24
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Gregory Casamento, 2012/01/24
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Gregory Casamento, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Fred Kiefer, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Ivan Vučica, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Ivan Vučica, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/01/25
- Re: NSXML* classes changed to use libxml2 directly... Should we merge this into the trunk?, Gregory Casamento, 2012/01/25