[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module.
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module. |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:37:57 -0800 |
From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:55:41 -0500
It shouldn't be overly complicated to create this sort of
functionality. One only needs to add an interface to HB so
it can be controled from within Guile. :)
this is the preferred modus operandi of some people.
I'm not sure all this would be worth it. At the very least,
it is an interesting idea to make HB entirely controlable
from within Guile code.
it is generally a good idea to make the hb engine completely
controllable from outside. whether this outside is guile or
perl or whatever is another issue.
I don't know what ice-9 common-list provides. Why can't they
use that from within HB's Guile module as it currently
stands?
i assumed you were not using eval, but i was wrong:
src/hbguile.c:165: gh_eval_str(code);
given this, programmers can indeed use (ice-9 common-list), so
that's a relief. :->
thi
- Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2002/02/11
- Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Neil Jerram, 2002/02/12
- Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2002/02/13
- Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Neil Jerram, 2002/02/13
- Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2002/02/13
- Re: Benchmarks of guile-www against HB's Guile module., Neil Jerram, 2002/02/15