Re: statically linking in srfi modules

[Mark H Weaver]

Richard Shann <address@hidden> writes:
> Well it seems I may have been premature in saying that srfi-1 was
> successfully loaded. Although the error message is gone, there is no
> symbol 'map which srfi-1 should have re-defined. 
> Can someone suggest what this might be a symptom of? 

I know what's wrong.  Please try replacing the calls to
'scm_c_register_extension' with the following:

  scm_c_define_module ("srfi srfi-1",  init_srfi_1,  NULL);
  scm_c_define_module ("srfi srfi-60", init_srfi_60, NULL);

Where 'init_srfi_1' and 'init_srfi_60' are defined as follows:

  static void init_srfi_1  (void *dummy) { scm_init_srfi_1  (); }
  static void init_srfi_60 (void *dummy) { scm_init_srfi_60 (); }

     Mark