[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
From: |
HiPhish |
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Sep 2018 00:16:00 +0200 |
"Not available" makes it sound like there something we cannot get a hold of.
Like you have a bag, but the contents of the bag are stuck to it, whereas
"nothing" makes me think of a bag that's actually empty.
Edwin Watkeys wrote:
> In previous work on validated systems in pharma manufacturing monitoring
> settings, there’s the concept of not available (“NAV”) for measurements
> which is used in contrast to not applicable (“NA”). We never used null/nil
> but always one of the above when describing measurements.
>
> Edwin Watkeys; 917-324-2435.
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Keith Wright, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing",
HiPhish <=
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", David Pirotte, 2018/09/15