guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Staging branch [substitute availability]


From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability]
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:24:03 +0100

Mathieu!

Mathieu Othacehe 写道:
Longer term, we need to figure out a better solution. It's now
obvious that we do not have the computation power to build all our
branches for 5 different architectures

I don't think it's obvious and I don't think it's true.

relying heavily on emulation for armhf and aarch64.

Only because we don't use the non-emulated hardware. Our (currently 3, one crashed) Overdrives 1000 sit idle for ~90% of the time.

The situation is worse for x86_64: 96% idleness based on /proc/uptime. Am I misinterpreting?

Kind regards,

T G-R

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]