[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs next variants
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs next variants |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:07:16 +0100 |
Hi,
On jeu., 09 mars 2023 at 19:51, Cayetano Santos <csantosb@inventati.org> wrote:
> (emacs-next-tree-sitter (emacs-next-gtk (emacs-next (emacs))))
[...]
> (emacs-next-gtk (emacs-next-tree-sitter (emacs-next (emacs))))
Note that emacs-next-tree-sitter is not from the 29 branch (emacs-next)
but from the 30 branch. Therefore, it would mean emacs-next-pgtk also
be an Emacs 30 version. I do not use them so I have not opinion.
And why not split the chain, i.e., having:
(define-public emacs-next-pgtk
(package
(inherit emacs-next)
and
(define-public emacs-next-tree-sitter
(package
(inherit emacs-next)
?
Cheers,
simon
- Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/09
- Re: Emacs next variants,
Simon Tournier <=
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, John Kehayias, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12