[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs next variants
From: |
Andrew Tropin |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs next variants |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Mar 2023 09:18:41 +0400 |
On 2023-03-10 20:36, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 10.03.2023 um 22:44 +0400 schrieb Andrew Tropin:
>> > > Thanks for pointing that. From my understanding, it does not
>> > > change what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built
>> > > using '--with-pgtk'. In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter
>> > > is built using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with
>> > > tree-sitter *and* pgtk support.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > simon
>> >
>> > As for the NEWS-29 file:
>> >
>> > "Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as
>> > undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard
>> > input of sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'."
>> >
>> > C.
>>
>> I haven't used X for a while, but if it's still the case for 30
>> version, I guess we can inherit pgtk from tree-sitter.
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of C-S-u with pure GTK to
> use GNOME's ibus widget? Granted, we have other problems with ibus
> currently, but it's still a part that makes the pgtk branch feel
> gnomier.
>
I'm not very into the details of implementation of pgtk and how it
affects C-S-u, also, I don't usually use C-S-u, so can't say much here.
> As for tree-sitter-with/without-gtk, I have no opinion here. We could
> try exporting package rewriters so that everyone can have their cup of
> tea, but maintaining one's own Emacs on the user/channel level ought
> not to be too difficult either.
I guess inheriting pgtk from tree-sitter looks most logical here: no
potential problems for X users, tree-sitter for wayland users. Updated
the inheritance hierarchy.
--
Best regards,
Andrew Tropin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/09
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, John Kehayias, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants,
Andrew Tropin <=
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, indieterminacy, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10