Re: Emacs next variants

[Cayetano Santos]

>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 22:44, Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in> wrote:

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 2023-03-10 19:24, Cayetano Santos wrote:
>
>>>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 19:14, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 17:59, John Kehayias
>>> <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> During this discussion some changes were made to this inheritance 
>>>> structure in
>>>>
>>>> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=b4c64ddce44bb31332784c3f8e037bd565194604>
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> <https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=070c335a91d5c245f0360e12c794e9109f9faaf1>
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointing that.  From my understanding, it does not change
>>> what Cayetanos is raising: emacs-next-tree-sitter is built using
>>> '--with-pgtk'.  In fact, the package emacs-next-tree-sitter is built
>>> using the master branch (Emacs 30 unbranched yet) with tree-sitter
>>> *and* pgtk support.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> simon
>>
>> As for the NEWS-29 file:
>>
>> "Running this configuration on X is known to have problems, such as
>> undesirable frame positioning and various issues with keyboard input of
>> sequences such as 'C-;' and 'C-S-u'."
>>
>> C.
>
> I haven't used X for a while, but if it's still the case for 30 version,
> I guess we can inherit pgtk from tree-sitter.
>
> This will update emacs-next-pgtk from emacs-29 to somewhere near 30 on
> master, but I it should be fine. I use the same commit as
> emacs-next-tree-sitter in my local tree-sitter+pgtk emacs package and
> everything seems to work for me.
>
> WDYT?

Personally, the closer to master, the better (and the simpler). What you
propose, inheritance of pgtk from tree-sitter, fits me well.

C.