[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs next variants
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs next variants |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:51:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.0 |
Am Sonntag, dem 12.03.2023 um 10:46 +0100 schrieb indieterminacy:
> Out of curiosity, where do such prescriptions concerning one tool or
> a set of tools get documented?
It isn't, but note the manual on version numbers leads with
> We usually package only the latest version of a given free software
> project. But sometimes, for instance for incompatible library
> versions, two (or more) versions of the same package are needed.
emacs is a notable exception here due to emacs next almost always
existing.
Cheers
- Re: Emacs next variants, (continued)
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, John Kehayias, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Simon Tournier, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, indieterminacy, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants,
Liliana Marie Prikler <=
- Re: Emacs next variants, Cayetano Santos, 2023/03/10
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/12
- Re: Emacs next variants, Andrew Tropin, 2023/03/10