Re: Emacs next variants

[Cayetano Santos]

>ven. 10 mars 2023 at 13:07, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Note that emacs-next-tree-sitter is not from the 29 branch (emacs-next)
> but from the 30 branch.  Therefore, it would mean emacs-next-pgtk also
> be an Emacs 30 version.  I do not use them so I have not opinion.
>
> And why not split the chain, i.e., having:
>
>         (define-public emacs-next-pgtk
>           (package
>             (inherit emacs-next)
>
> and
>
>         (define-public emacs-next-tree-sitter
>             (package
>               (inherit emacs-next)
>
> ?

Fine with me, even if to me emacs-next means latest from master,
including tree-sitter. You decide to use the feature, or not.

Gtk is something else, as it imposes a strong limitation on the use of
emacs (wayland).

C.